|
||||
Search
Login
This Month
Month Archive
|
Monday, June 19
by
Tim A
on Mon 19 Jun 2006 04:29 PM EDT
I did a study on this in the late 90's for a customer in which I came up with pretty much the same results. Even worse, skipping the website altogether was very high on the list. So not only did they not see the flash intro they never saw the homepage:
"The common use of "flash intros" to corporate websites has never made
much sense. Generally, they're a pain, and even for the few folks who
want to watch them, after seeing it once, why should they ever want to
go back again? Yet, for some reason, web designers love them, and
somehow keep convincing corporations to use them. However, a usability
expert studying these things now says that " the skip intro button is the most used button on the Internet."
While you can quibble over the hyperbole, it does make sense to
question why so many firms keep using these types of entryways, when it
clearly keeps people from the content they actually want -- such as how
to buy your product. (via TechDirt)
Thursday, June 1
by
Tim A
on Thu 01 Jun 2006 12:11 PM EDT
As Sunava Dutta points out, IE7 now includes a native XMLHTTPRequest object along side support of the ActiveX object as well.
In looking into a BlogChat bug with IE7 Beta with help from Sunava and others from MS we have determined that the ActiveX implementation in IE7 doesn't work exactly the same as pre-IE7 browsers. Brent had a theory about what was happening, although he mistakenly thought we were using the native object at the time. It seems it is the ActiveX implementation in IE7 that is refiring or some such thing. Folks should be cautious with their AJAX implementations in supporting IE7 and make sure they instantiate a native object in IE7 instead of the ActiveX one. One way to do this was posted by Joe Walker here. And I'll post from the current Dojo source code (revision 4219). Please forgive the formatting as I don't feel like editing it myself: 101
102 // These are in order of decreasing likelihood; this will change in time. 103 dojo.hostenv._XMLHTTP_PROGIDS = ['Msxml2.XMLHTTP', 'Microsoft.XMLHTTP', 'Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0']; 104 105 dojo.hostenv.getXmlhttpObject = function(){ 106 var http = null; 107 var last_e = null; 108 try{ http = new XMLHttpRequest(); }catch(e){} 109 if(!http){ 110 for(var i=0; i<3; ++i){ 111 var progid = dojo.hostenv._XMLHTTP_PROGIDS[i]; 112 try{ 113 http = new ActiveXObject(progid); 114 }catch(e){ 115 last_e = e; 116 } 117 118 if(http){ 119 dojo.hostenv._XMLHTTP_PROGIDS = [progid]; // so faster next time 120 break; 121 } 122 } 123 124 /*if(http && !http.toString) { 125 http.toString = function() { "[object XMLHttpRequest]"; } 126 }*/ 127 } 128 129 if(!http){ 130 return dojo.raise("XMLHTTP not available", last_e); 131 } 132 133 return http; 134 } 135 Thursday, May 18
by
Tim A
on Thu 18 May 2006 05:19 PM EDT
I really enjoy reading stuff like this as it reaffirms that what we're doing at SimpleFilter is just above and beyond what these big guys are doing:
It really was just three weeks ago that the news came out that Verizon agreed to settle a class action suit
brought against the company for being too aggressive in blocking spam.
Apparently, what the lawyers agreed to hasn't filtered back to those in
charge of handling the spam filters (perhaps it was caught in their own
spam filter), as the company is now being accused of turning on (oh
yes, once again) an overly aggressive spam filter
leading to many problems for users not getting important, legitimate,
emails. It's great that Verizon wants to curb spam for its users -- but
being overly aggressive without any way to opt-out or check the filter
is clearly problematic for people who expect to be able to get all of
their legitimate emails. Update: Verizon is now claiming that this was simply a glitch
with their spam filters -- and it's now been fixed. However, anyone
from Yahoo, America Online, MSN, Google, Roadrunner and a few other
ISPs who tried to email someone with a Verizon.net email address over
the past few days might want to try to resend that message. (via TechDirt)
Tuesday, May 9
by
Tim A
on Tue 09 May 2006 07:20 PM EDT
I like some of Blaine's street magic and his previous stunts were interesting if nothing more than physical endurance or some sort of grand magic trick. With Blaine you could never tell, until now. I'm pretty sure this whole underwater thing and trying for the world record was completely setup and planned from beginning till end. It is just a huge promotional thing with no magic involved and not much of a physical feat either.
At least it is more interesting than David Copperfield's completely fake big magic tricks that are nothing more than camera tricks with a complete shill audience. Does anybody really question why there were only about a dozen people to witness live the disappearance of the statue of liberty? Come on, what a joke. Same thing for the plane. Dumb. Here are reasons why this thing was completely setup: 1. The announcer points out very quickly after they hooked up the chains that they are unexpectedly heavier than they thought and it might cause problems for Blaine being able to come up for air or some such nonsense. First of all, any preparation for this kind of thing would have gone through about 100 trials beforehand. No way this would come up as a surprise and no way the announcer would key into it within seconds of putting the chains on.
2. Just seconds before "trouble" starts, the announcer just happens to mention that if we see bubbles that will indicate a problem. The announcer again says, "we're watching for bubbles". 3. Seconds after watching for bubbles their is a convenient black-out of the broadcast while the announcer is announcing there is trouble, there are bubbles, blah blah blah. 4. Why do the divers have to make a dramatic rescue anyway? He used a breathing device for days under there. Why not throw that on his face instead of going through the whole routine of getting him free of the chains. Or, you would think they would have a nice release valve at the bottom that would drain the water in a few seconds in case of an emergency. But having divers jump in and struggle makes things that much more interesting. Wednesday, May 3
by
Tim A
on Wed 03 May 2006 11:44 AM EDT
Joey deVilla of Tucows hosted another "Ask Tucows" chat yesterday. Brent and I sat in since they used our BlogChat service for the chat. For a transcript of the chat visit Joey's post. This was the second such chat and there are two more scheduled this year:
Thursday, April 27
by
Tim A
on Thu 27 Apr 2006 12:02 AM EDT
Waterboy points out:
What is more interesting is that The Star is likely breaking Google copyright and certainly their Terms of Service. Saturday, April 22
by
Tim A
on Sat 22 Apr 2006 02:59 PM EDT
Mark Skapinker of Brightspark (a Canadian seed stage software venture fund) has started blogging this month. He already has a couple excellent blog posts: Check them out. Monday, April 10
by
Tim A
on Mon 10 Apr 2006 11:55 AM EDT
I think Scott Johnson has this just about right:
Of course I have to link to Brent's evil N voice mail after working with one of those N's. This didn't have to do with architecture but rather having to deal with one of those evil N's. |
Advertisement:
Having Problems with SPAM? Its Simple - Filter Your SPAM with SimpleFilter. Available for individuals (POP3) and corporations (SMTP). Free Trial.
Advertisement:
Looking for BUSINESS CARDS? Look no further, checkout Kosmo Business Cards. We have glossy, full-colour, metal, magnetic, plastic cards, post-it notes, self-inking stamps, stickers and letterhead.
BlogChat Chatters
recent blogchatters: If one of the blog chatters is in you'll see a green indicator or an appropriate graphic. Just click on the green icon or the graphic and a custom chat window will pop up. you don't need an account or any special software. works with ie and mozilla on win/mac/linux. these chats are powered by blogchat |
||
|